By Ken Wilber
Here's a concise, entire review of Wilber's innovative notion and its software in modern-day global. In A concept of every thing, Wilber makes use of transparent, nontechnical language to offer advanced, state of the art theories that combine the nation-states of physique, brain, soul, and spirit. He then demonstrates how those theories and versions could be utilized to real-world difficulties in components resembling politics, medication, enterprise, schooling, and the surroundings. Wilber additionally discusses day-by-day practices that readers absorb as a way to practice this integrative imaginative and prescient to their very own daily lives.
Read or Download A Theory of Everything: An Integral Vision for Business, Politics, Science and Spirituality PDF
Similar consciousness & thought books
What's the dating among our perceptions and truth? what's the dating among the brain and the physique? those are questions with which philosophers have grappled for hundreds of years, and they're subject matters of substantial modern debate in addition. Hilary Putnam has approached the divisions among belief and truth and among brain and physique with nice creativity all through his occupation.
Even if it truly is glossy leather-based pants, a sparkly new Apple machine, or a fashion designer toaster, we make very important judgements as shoppers on a daily basis in response to our sensory event. Sensory appeals are all over the place, and they're intensifying, extensively altering how americans stay and paintings. The twenty-first century has develop into the age of aesthetics, and no matter if we know it or now not, this impression has taken over undefined, and masses extra.
Is intercourse identification a characteristic of one's brain or physique, and is it a relational or intrinsic estate? who's within the most sensible place to understand a person's intercourse, will we each one have a real intercourse, and is a person's intercourse an alterable attribute? while a person's intercourse project alterations, has the previous self disappeared and a brand new one emerged; or, has in basic terms the general public presentation of one's self replaced?
Within the Shadow of Hegel develops a brand new knowing of background working opposed to, yet within the shadow of, the Hegelian common sense of heritage because the unfolding of the totally Self-Conscious Spirit--Geist. during this context Plotnitsky examines Hegel's importance for Marx, Nietzsche, Freud, Bataille, and, specially, Derrida, and exposes either the proximities and distances of the Hegelian and poststructuralist knowing of heritage.
- The New Religious Consciousness
- European Review of Philosophy: Cognitive Dynamics
- In praise of love
- Perplexities of Consciousness
Additional info for A Theory of Everything: An Integral Vision for Business, Politics, Science and Spirituality
In addition to person-speciﬁc and community-speciﬁc classiﬁers, there may also be “free-ﬂoating” classiﬁers. These might include properties, universals, kinds, and so forth. These are not associated with, and presumably do not supervene on, any particular individual or group that represents them. Their nature or constitution does not essentially depend on their status as intentional objects of people’s mental representations. Classiﬁers in general are candidate targets of philosophical analysis or theorizing.
P: Respondent R intuits that case C is an instance of justice. P*: Case C is an instance of justice. What might P be evidence for? One possibility, of course, is (the truth of) P*. This evidential relation between P and P* is the one people usually have in mind when they say that intuitions are evidence. But attitudinal facts can be evidence for matters other than their own contents. Thus, P might equally be evidence for, say, P**: P**: R’s concept of justice, J1, is such that C is an instance of (or is in the extension of ) the content of J1.
The foregoing principles only address the matter of evidence possession. They are silent on the question of whether an evidence possessor is justiﬁed in believing (or holding another attitude) toward a hypothesis that the (possessed) item of evidence 34 A LV I N I . G O L D M A N supports. This is tricky terrain, and I won’t try to settle matters there. It is tempting to require not only that the evidence possessed does support the hypothesis in question but also that the evidence possessor is justiﬁed in believing that the evidence supports that hypothesis.
A Theory of Everything: An Integral Vision for Business, Politics, Science and Spirituality by Ken Wilber